Question
Atualizado em
2 jun 2022

  • Japonês
  • Inglês (EUA)
  • Chinês Simples (China)
  • Chinês Tradicional (Hong Kong)
Pergunta sobre Inglês (EUA)

‎‎アメリカの最高裁判事の場合、任期がないため腰を据えて長期的な視点から厄介な争点に取り組めるが、長期間メンバーが固定化されるため判断が硬直化されるといった弊害が指摘されている。
Justices of the United States Supreme Court have no tenure and can sit down to deal with thorny issues from a long-term perspective.
On the flip side, there are some criticisms pointing out that the judgments lose flexibility because those decisions are made by much the same members with much the same framework of thoughts for long.

Does this sound natural?

Respostas
Read more comments

  • Inglês (EUA)

  • Japonês

  • Inglês (EUA)

  • Japonês
[Notícias] Ei você! Aquele que está aprendendo um idioma!

Partilhar esta questão
‎‎アメリカの最高裁判事の場合、任期がないため腰を据えて長期的な視点から厄介な争点に取り組めるが、長期間メンバーが固定化されるため判断が硬直化されるといった弊害が指摘されている。
Justices of the United States Supreme Court have no tenure and can sit down to deal with thorny issues from a long-term perspective.
On the flip side, there are some criticisms pointing out that the judgments lose flexibility because those decisions are made by much the same members with much the same framework of thoughts for long.

Does this sound natural?
Similar questions
Trending questions
Pergunta anterior/Próxima pergunta

Pergunte a falantes nativos gratuitamente