- Japonês
-
Inglês (EUA)
-
Inglês (RU)
Sato Corp.'s behaviors seem to be dishonest. It stated it would try to check all products after confessing to violating other companies' rights last year. The statement was found false when police arrested the chairman, and most of its products were suspended. However seriously it takes the situation, we can't trust the company like before. People have been still harshly criticizing the Sato Corp. Nobody can defend it because it lacked compliance awareness and apologies for the customers. soa natural?
- Inglês (EUA)
Um pouco artificial
Sato Corp.'s behaviors seem to be dishonest.
It stated it would try to check all products after confessing to violating other companies' rights last year.
The statement was found false when police arrested the chairman, and most of its products were suspended.
However seriously it takes the situation, we can't trust the company like before.
People have been still harshly criticizing the Sato Corp.
Nobody can defend it because it lackedengaged compliancein awarenessunethical/illegal business practices and apologiesis forunapologetic to the customers.
Nobody can defend it because it lackedengaged compliancein awarenessunethical/illegal business practices and apologiesis forunapologetic to the customers.
Was this answer helpful?
Obviously wrong
Explanation is not enough
Written in a language I can't understand
Answer is not related to the question
Other reason
- Inglês (EUA)
Um pouco artificial
Sato Corp.'s behaviors seem to be dishonest.
It stated it would try to check all products after confessing to violating other companies' rights last year.
The statement was found false when police arrested the chairman, and most of its products were suspended.
However seriously it takes the situation, we can't trust the company like before.
People have been still harshly criticizing the Sato Corp.
Nobody can defend it because it lackedengaged compliancein awarenessunethical/illegal business practices and apologiesis forunapologetic to the customers.
Nobody can defend it because it lackedengaged compliancein awarenessunethical/illegal business practices and apologiesis forunapologetic to the customers.
I think compliance is a special word in Japanese that refers to compliance with law and regulations. Actually, I feel like I can understand the expression "lacked compliance awareness", but maybe it is uncommon when speaking about corporations, because we expect corporations to always be aware of the laws and regulations that they must abide by. So in this case, we would assume that the corporation disregarded those laws and regulations and acted unlawfully or unethically.
Was this answer helpful?
Com a HiNative, você pode ter sua escrita corrigida por falantes nativos gratuitamente ✍️✨.
- I'm Sato in charge of the upcoming meeting arrangement. soa natural?
- I'd like to consult with Mr. Sato. soa natural?
- I don't know why "," is needed before "if". I think "I'd have invited Mr. Sato if I'd known he ...
Que símbolo é este?
O símbolo de Nível de Língua apresenta a tua proficiência na língua na qual estás interessado. Definir o Nível de Língua ajuda os utilizadores a escrever respostas de fácil compreensão.
-
Iniciante
Dificuldade em compreender respostas a perguntas na língua indicada.
-
Iniciante-Intermediário
Capaz de fazer perguntas simples. Compreende respostas simples.
-
Intermediário
Capaz de fazer todo o tipo de perguntas gerais. Capaz de compreender respostas longas.
-
Avançado
Capaz de compreender respostas longas e complexas.
Show your appreciation in a way that likes and stamps can't.
By sending a gift to someone, they will be more likely to answer your questions again!
If you post a question after sending a gift to someone, your question will be displayed in a special section on that person’s feed.
Thank you very much! Your feedback is greatly appreciated.
I think compliance is a special word in Japanese that refers to compliance with law and regulations. Actually, I feel like I can understand the expression "lacked compliance awareness", but maybe it is uncommon when speaking about corporations, because we expect corporations to always be aware of the laws and regulations that they must abide by. So in this case, we would assume that the corporation disregarded those laws and regulations and acted unlawfully or unethically.